Each tab describes what the template has to offer and how it can help you build your own game.
Players distinguish the color of a word from the word itself as quickly as possible. This study is often used to test attention and memory and is frequently used as a neutral task for other studies. In this template, players must discern the word rather than the color of the word. You can easily customize the timing of the task, number of example rounds and actual rounds, and the focus icon through experiment variables and change the stimuli by editing the rounds.js file.
The flanker tasks asks participants to pick out the incongruent item in a sequence as quickly as possible. This study is often used to test attention and memory and is frequently used as a neutral task for other studies. In this template, players must discern the third letter in the sequence: fffff, ffhff, hhfhh, and hhhhh. You can easily customize the timing of the task, number of example rounds and actual rounds, and the focus icon through experiment variables and change the stimuli by editing the rounds.js file.
Lexical Decision Task
The lexical decision task asks participants to identify whether a sequence of letters makes up a word or not (i.e. stree versus steer). This study is often used to test attention and memory and is frequently used to measure implicit primes, to generate primes or as neutral task for other studies. In this template, players must discern whether a string is a word. You can easily customize the timing of the task, number of example rounds and actual rounds, and the focus icon through experiment variables and change the words and nonwords presented by editing the rounds.js file.
Implicit Association Task
The implicit association task is a classic experiment in implicit bias and cognition, asking participants to classify stimuli into one of two categories as quickly as possible. The idea is that people will sort items that are more strongly associated with a category more quickly than items they associate less with a category. For example, based on stereotypes, we may have stronger associations between some types of people and attributes like intelligent, funny, or tall. In this template, you can customize the words and categories people must select, the timing of the task, number of example rounds and actual rounds, and the order of round stimuli.
The prisoner’s dilemma is a classic study in cooperation in which two players simulate being partners in crime caught by the police. They are given the choice of whether to testify against the other in return for leniency or stay silent. The study is used to test human’s propensity to trust one another and cooperate when the individual payoff supports defection but the social optimum is to cooperate. In this template, you can customize the payoff structure, the number of rounds being played, the presence of a scoreboard, whether prior decisions are visible, and the behavior of bots.
Common Pool Resource
The common pool resource experiment is a classic study about social coordination in which a group of players must decide whether to use a common resource, like public grazing land, or their own private resource. The payout for using the private resource is fixed and usually small. The payout for using the common resource is potentially large, but only one person uses it. If all players use it, the payout is small or negative. This experiment is often used to study how people coordinate the use of common resources. In this template, you can customize the payoff structure, the number of rounds being played, the presence of a scoreboard, whether prior decisions are visible, and the behavior of bots
The ultimatum experiment is a classic study about fairness. This template enables researchers to implement a set of canonical bargaining experiments including variants of the ultimatum game, the dictator game, pirate game, and trust game. Each of these pits two players as alternate sides of a negotiation for splitting a pot of money. In the ultimatum game, one player makes an offer and the other can only accept or reject the offer. In the ultimatum with tipping game, the player making the offer can tip the recipient for accepting the offer. These studies provide insight into the people’s sense of personal benefit and fairness. In this template, you can customize the type of game, the number of rounds, whether subjects switch positions between rounds, the number of points distributed, and the behavior of bots.
The public good template is a classic study about free riding in which a group of players must decide whether to put money into a collective pot and split the rewards or keep their money for themselves and still split the pot. As in the prisoner’s dilemma, the individually rational choice is to keep your money and split the pot, called free riding while the socially optimal outcome is for everyone to put their money in the pot. In this template, you can change the amount paid from the pot, the information shown to users about others’ choices, the budget for each round, the number of rounds, and the behavior of bots.
Wildcat Wells is a new classic in the study of exploitation/exploration trade-offs in problem solving. In this template, participants much look for the best location to drill for oil. Each round, they must choose to drill a new well (“exploration”) or drill in areas that have already been explored (“exploitation”). In this template, you can control who sees whom; whether players see just well locations, amount of oil found, or both; how distinguishable good wells are from bad wells, the number of rounds, and the behavior of bots.
The travelling salesperson is a classic problem used to study exploitation/exploration tradeoffs in which participants must connect the “cities” to find the shortest path that includes all the “cities.” In each round, players submit their guess, see their distance, and then are given the opportunity to find a shorter path in the next round. In the multiplayer mode, participants are able to see one another’s answers and path length and can copy (“exploit”) better results. In this template, you can control who sees whom, whether players see others’ solutions, lengths, or both; the number of rounds, and the behavior of bots.
Native Survey (with jsPsych)
You can build your own surveys in Volunteer Science using the jsPsych Library. In this demo, we show you how to write a four question survey.
Native Survey Demo
Facebook Data Donation Demo
The Facebook data donation demo shows you how to request, collect, and save your subject’s Facebook data. We offer access to every endpoint available in the Facebook Apps api, including particpant’s posts, photos, birthday, demographic data, and friends list. This demo shows you the functions you use to request data access and then show the result to participants and/or save it as part of your study.
Volunteer Science enables you to create a chat room for any number of subjects in just sixteen lines of code. The demo shows you how to create the chat as well as format the chat window and text to ensure it fits your study’s needs. The chat demo also shows you how to save time-stamped chat data for future analysis.
If you have a lot of data to code, for example images, texts, audio, video; you can use our consumables framework to pull them into an experiment and have people code the data for you. The consumables framework balances data collection so you don't have too many people coding the same items and so users don't code the same thing twice. In this demo, we have a list of words to be classified as whether or not they are types of horses.
|Mechanical Turk Integration||✔||✘||✔|
|Access to Volunteers||✔||✘||✘|
|Contact Subjects via Push Notifications||Fall 2018||✘||✘|
|Contact Subjects via Email||Fall 2018||✔||✘|
|Integration with Amazon S3||Fall 2018||✘||✘|
|Collect Participant Social Media Data||✔||✘||✘|
|Research Account||1 Team||1 Person||✘|
We makes building online experiments easy by providing a range of API calls that make complex features easy.
- Want to make a study multiplayer? Just use the
- Want to save time-stamped data? Just use the
- Want to award a user for good performance and increase participant retention? Just use the
You don't need to reinvent the wheel.
We're constantly adding new functions to Volunteer Science to make your life easier.
The following functions pertaining to the VS Facebook API are globally accessible within tests.
denied-- Denied permissions are inaccesible and should not be requested.
revoked-- Revoked permissions are inaccesible in games and should not be requested.
open-- Open permissions have not yet been granted by the user. You may request them.
granted-- Data relating to granted permissions is ready for retrieval. Yes!
Checkout all of our APIs
*Limited time offer.
We have built over 50 studies, ranging from image-tagging and multiplayer problem solving to extension-based field experiments. If you have an idea for an online study, send us a message at firstname.lastname@example.org. A custom game typically costs $3,000 to $6,000.