X

Evaluation of Source Reliability

DesignatorLabelExplanation
AReliableNo doubt of authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency; has a history of complete reliability
BUsually ReliableMinor doubt about authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency; has a history of valid information most of the time
CFairly ReliableDoubt of authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency but has provided valid information in the past
DNot Usually ReliableSignificant Doubt about authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency but has provided valid information in the past
EUnreliableLacking in authenticity, trustworthiness, and competency; history of invalid information
FCan Not JudgeNo Basis exists for evaluating the reliability of the source

Evaluation of Information Content

DesignatorLabelExplanation
1ConfirmedConfirmed by other independent source; logical in itself; Consistent with other information on the subject
2Probably TrueNot Confirmed; logical in itself; consistent with other information on the subject
3Possibly TrueNot Confirmed; reasonably logical in itself; agrees with some other information on the subject
4Doubtfully TrueNot Confirmed; possible but not logical; no other information on the subject
5ImprobableNot Confirmed; not logical in itself; contradicted by other information on the subject
6Can Not JudgeNo Basis exists for evaluating the validity of the source

Demographics

Group:

Participant ID:

Current MOS:

Rank:

Years of Service:

Number of Deployments: